Recent bulk additions

[Liliput]

I notice that there seem to be many instances of erroneous and/or extraneous information appearing in the "Notes" section at top right of the dogs' pages. This has happened to existing pages, such as http://www.giantschnauzerpedigrees.com/ ... p?id=63416" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; for example, and I see that the recent "new" entries are often modifications of already existing pages, doing nothing but adding the "notes". Some other "notes" appear to be unconnected or random text.

[Pertneer]

For the time being please ignore the items in the notes. These item are for my benefit and will be cleared up in the coming week or two. I had a few bugs that did not show up during testing. I thought I had everything covered and I did not. I am addressing the major issues first like one dog having numerous offspring that I know is incorrect.

Please beer with me for the next few days.

[Liliput]

Hi- Actually, it might be a pleasure to "beer" up with you for a few days. Say, in the last day or so, someone has changed the sire and dam of my dog to incorrect names. She is:

http://www.giantschnauzerpedigrees.com/ ... p?id=63418" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This has in turn rendered a large portion (or majority) of a few other kennels' entire pedigrees erroneous. May I put her pedigree back in order, the way it was until then? It would be in agreement with online data from AKC, OFA, and Skansen in case or any doubt.

e.g. http://www.offa.org/vertpedigree.html?a ... 336#animal" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Thanks.

[Pertneer]

Upon further review I will be changing the information back to the backup copy of the information that I took before I ran the script. This will eliminate all of the material that was changed.

Sorry for any inconvenience.

Pertneer